Saturday, September 28, 2013

Dedicated PIN Code for Supreme Court of India

The Supreme Court of India got the dedicated PIN code 110201 by postal department to celebrate 41 years of introduction of the system. With such dedicated PIN Code, delivery of petition, notices etc. to Supreme Court will be easier and faster. Welcoming the allotment of dedicated PIN code for Supreme Court, Chief Justice of India (CJI), P Sathasivam asked postal Department to consider providing the same facility to all the High Courts across the country and the same can be initiated by extending it to the high courts situated in metro cities.

Postal Department further clarified in press note released by it that all mails addressed to the court carrying the pin code 110001 would also be delivered without a hitch.

Such customized dedicated pin codes can be extended to other bulk recipients (ex.- UPSC ) as it will reduce the transit time of mail delivery as well as cut effort and costs for India Post while improving the satisfaction level of the bulk recipients.

Now you may send your correspondence to Supreme Court at below address:

To,
The Supreme Court of India
PIN: 110201

Friday, September 27, 2013

Affixing of Common Seal

INTRODUCTION

Common seal is the signature of the company to any document on which it is affixed and binds the company for all obligations undertaken in the document. Companies Act, 1956 provides that, the company shall have a common seal from the date of its incorporation. However, Companies Act, 1956 does not describe the form, mode of affixing common seal or its custody etc. To remove the ambiguity and to prescribe best and uniform practices with respect to affairs pertaining to common seal, Council of the Institute of Company Secretaries of India has issued Secretarial Standard-8 (SS-8): “Affixing of Common Seal”.

In this Article we have thrown light on provisions pertaining to Common seal contained in Companies Act, 1956 and SS-8.

A company shall have only one common seal. The Articles of Association provides the procedure relating to affixing of common seal. Companies Act, 1956 requires affixation of the common seal on certain documents, share certificates and share warrants issued by the company.

APPROVAL

The common seal should be adopted by a resolution of the Board. The common seal is generally adopted at the first Board meeting. The impression of the common seal should be made part of the minutes of the meeting in which it is adopted.

FORM AND CONTENT

The common seal should be made of metal and capable of being manually operated. The common seal should have the name of the company and state in which the registered office is situated engraved in legible characters.

AUTHORITY AND MODE OF AFFIXATION

The common seal should be affixed to any instrument only by authority of a resolution of the Board or a committee authorized by the Board.

The common seal should be affixed in the presence of managing director or any two directors, and the company secretary or any other person as the Board may authorize for the purpose. The Articles of Association may provide for affixing of common seal in any other manner.

The persons in whose presence the seal is affixed should sign every instrument to which the seal of the company is so affixed.

REGISTER OF DOCUMENTS EXECUTED UNDER COMMON SEAL

Every company should maintain a register containing description of documents on which the common seal of the company has been affixed along with date and number of the resolution authorizing the affixation of common seal; date of affixing seal on the document; name(s) of person(s) who attested the affixation; and the place at which the document was so sealed. The register should be maintained at the registered office of the company.

The common seal should be kept at the registered office or at any other office of the company authorized by the Board. The common seal should be kept in the custody of a director of the company or the company secretary or any other official, as authorized by the Board.

CUSTODY OF COMMON SEAL

In the modern era, where the parties to an agreement are constantly travelling or if a company has operation in different parts of the country, below question arises
"whether Board Resolution needs to be passed or any other formality needs to be done, if common seal is proposed to be affixed outside the state/ city where the registered office is situated?”

Please note that there is no prohibition on moving the common seal out of registered office in Companies Act, 1956 or Secretarial Standard. However, to avoid any ambiguity and troubles at later stage, the companies normally pass the resolution for carrying the common seal outside registered office. However, it would be prudent if a clause may be inserted in the resolution authorizing the affixing of common seal itself. A sample Board Resolution has been given below for reference:

RESOLVED that the common seal be affixed on all the necessary documents executed/to be executed for availing the above mentioned credit facilities and Shri ……………….. and ………………. of the company be and hereby jointly and severally authorized to counter-sign wherever the common seal is affixed.

RESOLVED FURTHER that the common seal be kept in the custody of Shri ……………….. Secretary of the company and may be carried at such place outside registered office if required for execution of documents pertaining to the aforesaid activities.

SEAL OF COMPANY FOR USE OUTSIDE INDIA: OFFICE SEAL

A company whose objects require or comprise transactions of business outside India may have for use in any territory, district or place not situated in India an official seal.

The office seal shall be a facsimile of the common seal of the company. Official seal should have engraved in it the name of the territory, district or place where it is to be so used in addition to the name and state in which the registered office of the company is situated.

Use of official seal requires an enabling provision in the Articles. A company may have more than one official seal. However, each territory, district or place not situated in India should not have more than one official seal. A deed or other document to which an official seal is duly affixed shall bind the company as if it had been sealed with the common seal of the company.

JUDICIAL VIEW ON AFFIXING OF COMMON SEAL

In Panchanan Dhara & Others vs Monmatha Nath Maity (Decd.) thru L.RS. [2006] 131 Comp Cas 577 (SC), the Supreme Court observed that, “it is a relic of the days when mediaeval barons, who could not read or write, used their rings to make a characteristic impress. Even in absence of a seal, the company may still be held to be liable having regard to the nature of a transaction and the authority of those who had executed it. If the act of the directors is not ultra vires or no public policy is involved, the parties acting thereupon cannot be left at large.”

ALTERNATIVE OF AFFIXING COMMON SEAL

While executing any agreement, deed etc. below execution clause may be used in place of common seal:

For XYZ Limited


(Authorised Signatory)

Monday, August 26, 2013

Real Estate Regulator in India

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Bill, 2013, is a bill to protect home buyers from unscrupulous developers and builders by setting up real estate regulator. This shall cover up all projects coming up on more than 1000 Sq mtr of land or involving more than 12 apartments. It also contains provision for mandatory public disclosure of all project details. Tough penal provisions have been prescribed under the bill for putting out misleading advertisement. To monitor and regulate real estate agents, this bill provides for registering them the proposed real estate regulator. To curb the menace of money being diverted to other project and consequently delay in completion of project, this bill provides that the developer will have to deposit 70% of the funds received for particular project. Adjudication officer under this bill shall not be below the rank of joint secretary. Further, it is also proposed to appoint a real estate appellate authority.

Opening bank account of executor

When a person writes a “will”, he nominates a person to as the “executor” of the will. The responsibility of the executor is to divide the property and other assets (“estate”) of the deceased among legal heirs or successors of the deceased. On death of the person, the executor has to approach the court and get the will probated. A copy of the will certified by a court is called “probate”. After obtaining the probate, the executor will take necessary action to execute the will. For this purpose, he may need to open a bank account in to which the balance of the deceased will be transferred. Accounts may be opened in the name of executors in the following manner: “XXXXX, Executor to the estate of YYYYY deceased.” Caution: (i) If more than one executor is appointed, they have to do it jointly. They may jointly authorize one of them to operate bank accounts. (ii) An executor cannot borrow on behalf of the estate. Hence, care should be take not to allow any overdraft in the account of an executor. (iii) Bank should exercise caution allow transfer of money from such account to the personal account of the executor.

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

Withholding Tax in India


I. INTRODUCTION:

Withholding tax is a government requirement for the payer of an item of income to withhold or deduct tax from the payment, and pay that tax to the government.

II. WITHHOLDING TAX IN INDIA:

Chapter XVII-B of the Income-tax Act provides for deduction of tax at source on payments made by any assessee. These provisions are also applicable in case of payment made to non-residents.

Section 195 casts an obligation on the person responsible for payment to non-resident to deduct tax at source at the time of payment or at the time of credit of the sum to the account of the non-resident.

III. WITHHOLDING TAX FOR NRIS AND FOREIGN COMPANIES:
Withholding Tax Rates for payments made to Non-Residents are determined by the Finance Act passed by the Parliament for various years. The current rates are:

1. Interest - 20% of Gross Amount
2. Dividends - 10%
3.Royalties 20%
4.TechnicalServices20%
5. Any other Services - Individuals - 30% of net income

Companies/Corporates - 40% of net income

The above rates are general and in respect of the countries with which India does not have a Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA).

IV. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)
Statutory functions in respect of taxation of foreign companies and non-residents and withholding tax on remittances abroad are performed by Director of Income Tax (International Taxation)
There are five DITs (International Taxation) located at Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai and Bangalore.

V. PAN & FILING OF RETURN

The amendment made applicable from 1st April 2010 relates to the requirement of a foreign company to obtain a Permanenet Account Number (PAN) i.e. to register with the Indian Tax authorities.

Now, the foreign company is required to furnish a Permanent Account Number (PAN) to the payer in India. If the recipient fails to provide the PAN, withholding tax rate would be the higher of the existing rate as per the ITA or treaty, or 20%. This would result in additional withholding taxes in India, for which there may not be any credit available in the foreign Country.

Also, in the absence of a PAN, the Indian tax authorities will not entertain an applicationfrom the recipient for a lower withholding tax rate.

Currently though, the Indian law requires all the foreign companies to file return of income, with respect to income being earned from India– even if the applicable taxes have been paid in India.

It would thus be advisable for foreign companies to initiate the process for obtaining PAN especially if they arereceiving certain royalties / fees / interest from their Indian group companies / collaborators.


VI. TAXABILITY OF TECHNICAL, MANAGERIAL OR CONSULTING SERVICES PROVIDED BY FOREIGN COMPANIES TO THE INDIAN CLIENTS PERFORMED OUTSIDE INDIA

Another important amendment relates to the taxability of technical, managerial or consulting services provided by foreign companies to the Indian clients; when such services are performed outside India. Foreign companies were taking a stand that such services should not be taxable in India, since they were not performed in India and had no territorial nexus with India. Their stand was vindicated by the Supreme Court (SC) in the case of Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Industries (288 ITR 408), where the apex court held that services should be rendered as well as used in India for being taxed in India. It therefore held that if both conditions were not fulfilled, the fees for technical services was not chargeable to tax in India.

VII. RECENT DEVELOPMENT

Samsung case:

In this Case the Karnatake High Court observed that every overseas payment would be liable to withholding tax, whether or not that payment was ultimately taxable as income in India.


Prasad Productions case

A special bench of the Chennai tribunal ruled that tax needs to be withheld only on those payments made overseas that are taxable in the hands of the non-resident. That goes against November's Karnataka High Court decision in the Samsung case, which said that every overseas remittance had to withhold tax unless it had a nil withholding order from the Revenue Department.

The Chennai Tribunal further observed that the taxpayer can decide whether a transaction is taxable and if not, there is no need for a nil withholding order.

Van Oord case

In this case, the Delhi High Court also ruled that withholding tax applies only to payments which are taxable in India

India Singapore tax Treaty

The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) has recently held that the fees paid by Indian Company for technical services of a foreign Company will not be taxed in India under the India-Singapore Treaty (“Treaty”). The rationale given behind this decision is that advisory services such as comments and suggestions do not fall within the purview of the term ‘Fee for Technical Services’ under Article 12 of the treaty.

This ruling of AAR came in the wake of the application filed by the Bharati AXA General Insurance Co. Ltd. (“BAGICL”) to know that if the foreign Company AXA ARC has any liability to pay tax in India in respect of the fee received from the BAGICL.

This ruling has come as a relief to those foreign companies who render support services so as to ensure uniformity and flawless quality in the business dealings of the group entities. Further, this ruling can provide some respite to the companies which do not have a permanent establishment in India as this ruling also state that the payment received by the companies having no permanent establishment in India cannot be taxed as business profits under the Treaty.

VIII. CONCLUSION

Tax Treaties: The non‐resident can yet take shelter under the tax treaty, especially India’s tax treaties with countries like Singapore, USA, UK, etc. that have a restricted/narrow definition of fees for technical services.

AAR: Although advance ruling authority (AAR) is binding to the parties appear before the authority and the transaction in relation to which the ruling was given because the ruling was rendered on a set of facts and cannot be of general application. However, it may have persuasive value.

Write us for more information on any assistance related to tax laws in India.

Thursday, December 16, 2010

Project Visa for expats in Power & Steel Sectors


The Government of India has introduced a separate visa regime -- called `P' (Project) Visa -- within the employment visa regime for foreign nationals coming to India for execution of projects in the power and steel sectors. Initially the project Visa will cover only Power & Steel Sectors.

Project Specific Visa:

(i) Visa would be project Specific. A specific endorsement of Visa sticker would indicate the name & location of project.
(ii) The Project Visa would be issued only for skilled/highly skilled persons.
(iii) Only those the foreign nationals employed in the power and steel sector shall be allowed to take advantage of this Visa.

Multiple Entry facility:

(i) The guidelines for `P' Visa clearly say that its validity will initially be for the duration of the project/contract with multiple-entry facility. "It, however, cannot exceed one year.

Period of ‘P’ Visa:

(i) The period of Visa would be determined on case to case basis.
(ii) The period of visa would be initially for a period of one year or for the actual duration of the project / contract, whichever is less.
(iii) P Visa can be extended only with the prior approval of MHA.

Required documents and information:

(i) The Project visa would be issued based on submission of the relevant documents clearly establishing that the project/contract has been assigned to the particular foreign company by the Indian company/organization concerned.
(ii) A separate application form for Project Visa has been devised. The same may be obtained from the website of Ministry of Corporate affairs or alternatively our offices may be contacted in this regard.

Time:

(i) Project Visa will be issued only after approval from concerned authorities in India, the processing of which may take 45-50 days

Conditions for grant of ‘P’ Visa:

(i) A Project Visa holder cannot engage in another project either of the same company or of a different company and his or her work will be restricted to the location of the project.
(ii) In no circumstances would the person be allowed to be engaged in another project either of the same company or of a different company.
(iii) A person coming on Project Visa will not be allowed to take up employment in the same Indian company for a period of two years from the date of commissioning of the project.
(iv) The foreigner coming on Project Visa will have to register himself/herself with the FRRO/FRO concerned within 14 days of arrival if the validity of visa is for more than 180 days. If the validity of visa is for a period of 180 days or less, registration would not be required.
(v) The Indian Company engaging the foreign national for executing the project / contract would be responsible for the conduct of the foreign national during his/her stay in India and also for the departure of such foreign national upon expiry of visa.

Monday, October 25, 2010

Comparison between Liaison Office & Branch Office




It a comparison between Liaison office and Branch office in India on various aspect. Click on the picture for large view.

Write us for more information on setting up Liaison office or Branch office in India.